MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389084072 · doi:10.1121/10.0023336

Energy partitioning of the underwater soundscape

2023· article· en· W4389084072 on OpenAlexaffabout
David R. Barclay, Najeem Shajahan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)HydrophoneAmbient noise levelNoise (video)AcousticsUnderwaterGeologySoundscapeCoherence timeSound energyVenusComputer scienceOffshore wind powerUnderwater acousticsWind speedEnvironmental scienceMeteorologySound (geography)Wind powerOceanographyPhysicsMathematicsEngineeringStatisticsArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A four-element three-dimensional hydrophone array has been deployed on the Strait of Georgia node of the Victoria Experimental Network Under the Sea (VENUS) since March 2020. To the present, continuous pressure time series data from the four sensors has been streamed ashore and made available by Ocean Networks Canada. A technique for classifying and partitioning ambient noise using the three-dimensional noise coherence function is applied to the recordings. The noise coherence (directionality) due to wind generated surface noise and individual ships is analytically modelled using measured environmental inputs such as the time varying sound speed profile and sediment properties from the measurement site and compared with the observation. The theoretical coherence curve is computed by mixing the contributing sources until a best-fit is found. Since the wind generated surface noise coherence is stable and independent of the source effective sound power per unit area, the contribution of ship noise to the soundscape can be exactly determined. Applying this algorithm to the long-term data set allows the relative contribution of ship noise to the soundscape in the region to summarized succinctly. [Research supported by ONR.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207