MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389087890 · doi:10.37394/232029.2023.2.21

Introduction to the Khalij Limestone Member Type Section in the Gadvan Formation of Iran: A Comprehensive Analysis Utilizing 38 Exploration and Development Wells and 1 Surface Section of Gadvan

2023· article· en· W4389087890 on OpenAlexaff
Zohreh Movahed, Ahmad Shemirani, Abbas Sadeghi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Sciences & Development · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsSchlumberger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutcropForaminiferaGeologyLithostratigraphyWackestoneFaciesSection (typography)Sedimentary depositional environmentPaleontologyCarbonateBenthic zoneThin sectionGeochemistrySedimentary rockOceanographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Khalij limestone member, well-known for its abundant benthic facies, is situated in the middle segment of the Gadvan shaly formation, boasting an average thickness of approximately 14 meters. This specific member is exclusively found below the surface, devoid of any exposed outcrops, and is characterized by the presence of easily identifiable orbitolinid limestone. Well logging techniques, such as Gamma Ray and Density measurements, prove particularly effective in identifying this distinct layer. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the lithostratigraphy and microstratigraphy within the Gadvan formation, with a specific emphasis on the Khalij limestone member. A regional stratigraphic assessment covered an extensive area of about 100,000 square kilometers in the Fars and Dezful regions within the Zagros region. To achieve this, data from 38 exploration and development wells were utilized, and approximately 1,400 microscopic thin sections from the Gadvan formation were meticulously examined. The paramount contribution of this research lies in the establishment of a representative type section for the Khalij limestone member, characterized by a thickness of 13 meters. Detailed microscopic analysis has revealed that this member predominantly comprises wackestone carbonate, featuring microfossils, particularly foraminifera from the orbitolindae family. Based on the observed species index, it has been determined to be of Barremian age and linked to a lagoon-like depositional environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Sciences & Development→Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→