MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389089629 · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1338537

Editorial: Biogeochemical dynamics in urban systems: interactions, feedbacks and cumulative effects

2023· editorial· en· W4389089629 on OpenAlexaff
Carl P. J. Mitchell, Claire Oswald, Sarah H. Ledford

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Environmental Science · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiogeochemical cycleEnvironmental scienceDynamics (music)Environmental chemistryChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biogeochemical dynamics in urban systems: interactions, feedbacks and cumulative effectsMore than half of the world's population lives in urban areas and the proportion of urban inhabitants continues to increase in most countries (United Nations, 2019).Biogeochemical dynamics in urban systems are unique because of major alterations to hydrological dynamics and surface cover, as well as proximity to anthropogenic emissions of elements, various contaminants, greenhouse gases, and nutrients (Kaye et al., 2006).As urban areas evolve, engineered and/or nature-based solutions such as low-impact development features are also increasingly used to mitigate various impacts of urban development, but likely not yet with fully understood biogeochemical and hydrological implications (Delesantro et al., 2022;Hopkins et al., 2022;Zhang et al., 2023).Understanding the unique biogeochemical cycling dynamics in urban systems remains a major challenge to sustainable urban life and mitigation of downstream impacts.The goal of this Research Topic was to bring diverse scientific and interdisciplinary studies, specific to biogeochemical dynamics in cities, together to advance urban biogeochemical science.Hopefully, these works can collectively help municipal decisionmaking that aims to improve the lives of people and organisms in cities. Biogeochemical dynamics in urban systems are largely, but not entirely, distinct from those in rural or natural landscapes.The cycling of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, contaminants, and other matter in urban landscapes, water bodies, atmospheres, and green infrastructure such as green roofs continue to be re-thought, particularly in relation to demography, crumbling or renewed infrastructure, global climate change, and interactions among major environmental cycles.As the world continues to urbanize, it is increasingly clear that improving our understanding of biogeochemical dynamics in diverse urban systems at different scales is critical.This Research Topic includes eight original research papers encompassing urban biogeochemical research across the United States, Europe, and Asia.These works have made advances in our understanding of urban salinization and solute mobility (including complex mixtures termed "chemical cocktails"), trace organic compound transformations,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0120.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Environmental ScienceSame topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207