La salida del clóset en la familia como momento de crisis en el ejercicio de la violencia simbólica contra jóvenes LGBT de la Ciudad de México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo hace aportes analíticos y descriptivos a partir de experiencias recogidas en 17 entrevistas alrededor de la salida del clóset a jóvenes LGBT y a nueve familias de la Ciudad de México con al menos un* integrante LGBT. Usamos el concepto de violencia simbólica de Pierre Bourdieu para explicar el proceso de inculcación que establece la heterosexualidad y la identidad cisgénero como régimen sexual en la familia en tanto núcleo fundamental de aprendizaje y disciplinamiento corporal y sexual. La salida del clóset es el momento en que l*s jóvenes nombran un deseo silenciado o altamente estigmatizado, primero para sí mism*s y luego para otr*s. Este proceso es un quiebre frente a los aprendizajes adquiridos previamente. El concepto de violencia simbólica muestra aspectos de dicho proceso que no explican nociones como de la homo-lesbo-bi-transfobia internalizada o la de homo-lesbo-bi-transfobia en tanto implicación de quienes son objeto de la violencia en su sostenimiento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".