MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389098115 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.875

Lifetimes of metastable windy states in two-dimensional Rayleigh–Bénard convection with stress-free boundaries

2023· article· en· W4389098115 on OpenAlexafffund
Qi Wang, David Goluskin, Detlef Lohse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Commission
KeywordsConvectionMetastabilityRayleigh numberPrandtl numberRayleigh–Bénard convectionPhysicsMechanicsNatural convectionQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-dimensional horizontally periodic Rayleigh–Bénard convection between stress-free boundaries displays two distinct types of states, depending on the initial conditions. Roll states are composed of pairs of counter-rotating convection rolls. Windy states are dominated by strong horizontal wind (also called zonal flow) that is vertically sheared, precludes convection rolls and suppresses heat transport. Windy states occur only when the Rayleigh number $Ra$ is sufficiently above the onset of convection. At intermediate $Ra$ values, windy states can be induced by suitable initial conditions, but they undergo a transition to roll states after finite lifetimes. At larger $Ra$ values, where windy states have been observed for the full duration of simulations, it is unknown whether they represent chaotic attractors or only metastable states that would eventually undergo a transition to roll states. We study this question using direct numerical simulations of a fluid with a Prandtl number of 10 in a layer whose horizontal period is eight times its height. At each of seven $Ra$ values between $9\times 10^6$ and $2.25\times 10^7$ we have carried out 200 or more simulations, all from initial conditions leading to windy convection with finite lifetimes. The lifetime statistics at each $Ra$ indicate a memoryless process with survival probability decreasing exponentially in time. The mean lifetimes grow with $Ra$ approximately as $Ra^4$ . This analysis provides no $Ra$ value at which windy convection becomes stable; it might remain metastable at larger $Ra$ with extremely long lifetimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207