MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389098319 · doi:10.3389/fncel.2023.1332869

Editorial: Insights in non-neuronal cells: 2022

2023· editorial· en· W4389098319 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica M. Rosin, Marie‐Ève Tremblay, Jason R. Plemel

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
Topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversité LavalWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of VictoriaMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EDITORIAL article Front. Cell. Neurosci., 28 November 2023Sec. Non-Neuronal Cells Volume 17 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2023.1332869

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0120.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Cellular NeuroscienceSame topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcationFrench-language works237,207