MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Low Power AI Hardware Accelerator for Microwave-Based Ice Detection

2023· article· en· W4389101921 on OpenAlexaff
Dima Kilani, Mohammad H. Zarifi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer hardwareArtificial neural networkHardware accelerationDetectorPower (physics)Electrical engineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsField-programmable gate arrayEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fusion of sensors with AI at the edge enables energy-efficient and real-time monitoring and detection. However, very few hardware implementations of edge AI in microwave sensing structures have been reported. In this work, an AI hardware accelerator is presented to empower a microwave-based ice detector, enabling accurate classification of ice, water, and air. The AI accelerator is composed of a current mirror crossbar circuit to perform parallel computations of multiply-and-accumulate operations within the neural network. The proposed circuit design was implemented and simulated in 22 nm FDSOI technology with a power supply of 1.8 V, consuming a low power of$110\ \mu \mathrm{W}$and occupying a small area of$500\ \mu m^{2}$. The AI hardware accelerator achieved a high inference accuracy of 96.5% even with the presence of transistor mismatch variations, compared to the ideal accuracy of 98.8% obtained from the same implementation of the neural network using MATLAB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207