MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389104581 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2023.3334210

A Single-Chip Liquid Crystal Variable Capacitor Using a Microfabrication Process for Tunable RF and Microwave Applications

2023· article· en· W4389104581 on OpenAlexaff
Hassan Kianmehr, Raafat R. Mansour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitorVariable capacitorMicrofabricationCapacitanceMaterials scienceCapacitance probeOptoelectronicsEquivalent series resistanceDecoupling capacitorElectrical engineeringChipQ factorMicrowaveElectronic engineeringVoltageFabricationEngineeringResonatorPhysicsTelecommunicationsElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the implementation of a single-chip silicon-micromachined variable capacitor employing nematic liquid crystal (LC). The LC substance is confined within a slender micromachined enclosure, enabling electronic tuning of its dielectric characteristics. The compact dimensions of these chip capacitors facilitate their utilization across an extensive range of RF tunable/reconfigurable applications. This article thoroughly explains the fabrication procedure and includes comprehensive discussions on simulation as well as measurement results of the chip-based LC variable capacitors. Three chip capacitor configurations are demonstrated: 1) single port shunt capacitor; 2) two-port series capacitor with an integrated bias line; and 3) two-port series capacitor. The shunt capacitor displays an 18% variation in capacitance, while the quality factor ranges from 44 to 123. The measurements of the capacitor with the integrated bias line reveal a 21% tuning range accompanied by a quality factor ranging from 22 to 45 at 1.25 GHz. On the other hand, the two-port series capacitor exhibits a 23% change in capacitance values while demonstrating a quality factor that varies between 30 and 105 at 1.25 GHz. The chip capacitors discussed in this work are manufactured utilizing an in-house multilayer microfabrication process. An ion beam irradiation (IBI) process is developed for the treatment of the prealignment layer of highly miniature capacitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207