MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389104731 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2023.3336191

Safe and Accelerated Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based O-RAN Slicing: A Hybrid Transfer Learning Approach

2023· article· en· W4389104731 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmad M. Nagib, Hatem Abou-Zeid, Hossam S. Hassanein

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceRadio access networkTransfer of learningSoftware deploymentRanSlicingReuseDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceMachine learningComputer networkSoftware engineeringWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The open radio access network (O-RAN) architecture supports intelligent network control algorithms as one of its core capabilities. Data-driven applications incorporate such algorithms to optimize radio access network (RAN) functions via RAN intelligent controllers (RICs). Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms are among the main approaches adopted in the O-RAN literature to solve dynamic radio resource management problems. However, despite the benefits introduced by the O-RAN RICs, the practical adoption of DRL algorithms in real network deployments falls behind. This is primarily due to the slow convergence and unstable performance exhibited by DRL agents upon deployment and when encountering previously unseen network conditions. In this paper, we address these challenges by proposing transfer learning (TL) as a core component of the training and deployment workflows for the DRL-based closed-loop control of O-RAN functionalities. To this end, we propose and design a hybrid TL-aided approach that leverages the advantages of both policy reuse and distillation TL methods to provide safe and accelerated convergence in DRL-based O-RAN slicing. We conduct a thorough experiment that accommodates multiple services, including real VR gaming traffic to reflect practical scenarios of O-RAN slicing. We also propose and implement policy reuse and distillation-aided DRL and non-TL-aided DRL as three separate baselines. The proposed hybrid approach shows at least: 7.7% and 20.7% improvements in the average initial reward value and the percentage of converged scenarios, and a 64.6% decrease in reward variance while maintaining fast convergence and enhancing the generalizability compared with the baselines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in CommunicationsSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207