DomainFit: Identification of Protein Domains in cryo-EM maps at Intermediate Resolution using AlphaFold2-predicted Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has revolutionized our understanding of macromolecular complexes, enabling high-resolution structure determination. With the paradigm shift to in situ structural biology recently driven by the ground-breaking development of cryo-focused ion beam milling and cryo-electron tomography, there are an increasing number of structures at sub-nanometer resolution of complexes solved directly within their cellular environment. These cellular complexes often contain unidentified proteins, related to different cellular states or processes. Identifying proteins at resolutions lower than 4 Å remains challenging because the side chains cannot be visualized reliably. Here, we present DomainFit, a program for automated domain-level protein identification from cryo-EM maps at resolutions lower than 4 Å. By fitting domains from artificial intelligence-predicted models such as AlphaFold2-predicted models into cryo-EM maps, the program performs statistical analyses and attempts to identify the proteins forming the density. Using DomainFit, we identified two microtubule inner proteins, one of them, a CCDC81 domain-containing protein, is exclusively localized in the proximal region of the doublet microtubule from the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila . The flexibility and capability of DomainFit makes it a valuable tool for analyzing in situ structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".