MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389110941 · doi:10.35326/pkm.v6i2.1941

EMANFAATAN SEJENGKAL TANAH MILIK WARGA UNTUK DIKOMERSILKAN MENJADI PEMENUHAN KEBUTUHAN HINGGA PROSPEK EKONOMI

2022· article· id· W4389110941 on OpenAlexaff
Syamsul Alam Ramli, Widya Utami, Mujammad Kassa, Desy Safitry, Nabika Sandi, Putri Cahyani Hatta, Afilla, Pradono Suryo Adrianto, Dhandi Adnan, Aditya Santoso Gunawan

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat MEMBANGUN NEGERI · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal Management and Development
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesForestryPolitical scienceGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bergulirnya Wabah Covid-19 yang melanda Indonesia sejak akhir 2019 sampai dengan saat ini menjadikan sebagian sumber mata pencaharian di berbagai daerah menjadi sulit. Desa Lare-lare dengan luas wilayah ± 80 km2 jumlah jiwa 1930 dari 482 KK diapid oleh pegunungan dan pantai dimana luas wilayah pertanian sebesar 350 hektar. Diketahui bahwa uang yang keluar untuk kebutuhan sayur dari 482 KK X Rp 5.000 dalam sehari sebesar Rp 2.410.000, dalam satu bulan mencapai Rp 72.300.000, sehingga dalam satu tahun sebesar Rp 8.676.000, Hal ini menjadi tujuan dari pengabdian mahasiswa KKN-T Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo Angkatan III tahun 2021 untuk meraih peluang pasar dari peamanfaatan sejengkal tanah warga. Metode yang digunakan adalah budi daya kangkung cabut melalui pemanfaatan sejengkal tanah milik warga dan pemasaran dengan system basket marketing Adapun persiapan yang dilakukan untuk proses budidaya yaitu mempersiapkan rencana pengabdian, menyediakan kurikulum penanaman, Sosialisai. Hasil pengabdian dari pemanfaatan sejengkal tanah iala terpenuhinya kebutuhan sayur warga dan mendapatkan tambahan penghasilan serta menjadi motifasi berkelanjutan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat MEMBANGUN NEGERISame topicCoastal Management and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207