Personalized PV system recommendation for enhanced solar energy harvesting using deep learning and collaborative filtering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electricity is a crucial aspect of modern life, and with the increasing population and industrialization, energy demand has risen significantly. A swift transition to renewable energy sources such as wind and solar is essential for saving the planet. Solar energy is one of the most widely used renewable energy solutions, but choosing a PVSC poses a challenging problem that involves considering various factors, such as geographical location and energy consumption patterns. In this study, we investigate the effectiveness of using machine learning techniques to assist users in selecting the most suitable PVSC for their needs. We propose a new framework for PVSC recommendation, which encompasses a PV power forecasting model and a PV configuration recommendation system. We propose two forecasting models, one based on LSTM and the other based on CNN architecture. These two elements are responsible for extracting relevant features from time-series meteorological data, which are then passed to a feed-forward MLP layer that predicts the monthly energy production for different PVSCs. Subsequently, the prediction results are utilized to determine the optimal Residential scale PVSC for households, taking into account location and historical consumption data. The system was trained on simulated data and then tested on both a hold-out simulated test set and a real-world dataset. Our experiments show that the proposed framework is effective for long-term PV power forecasting and PVSC recommendation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".