MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389127232 · doi:10.5151/2594-5327-15346

DETECÇÃO DE FALHAS EM MOTORES TRIFÁSICOS COM TECNOLOGIA MCM NA ARCELOR-MITTAL INÓX BRASIL

2009· article· pt· W4389127232 on OpenAlexaff
Ideraldo Aparecido de Castro Pereira, José Ferreira da Silva Neto, Igor Barros Mairinck, Ari Magno Vieira, Kilder Neves

Bibliographic record

VenueABM Proceedings · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMitel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PDF | O método de Detecção de Falhas em motores elétricos trifásicos, com tecnologia MCM (Motor Condition Monitor), baseia-se no o conceito de modelamento matemático, para diagnosticar com antecedência as degradações progressivas de natureza elétrica ou mecânica do sistema monitorado. As variações ocorridas no sistema, seja proveniente do processo ou por degradação, são perceptíveis quando analisadas no domínio da freqüência. A detecção de falha progressiva é realizada comparando os sinais de tensões e correntes medidos no processo com os registros do modelo matemático. A eficiência do equipamento foi avaliada utilizando o motor do exaustor de gás da regeneração de ácido. Este trabalho teve como suporte os testes de avaliação realizada pela Gerência de Área de Engenharia de Manutenção (PICE) e a Gerência de Área de Manutenção de Utilidades (PEUM) da ARCELOR- MITTAL Inóx Brasil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueABM ProceedingsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207