MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389132548 · doi:10.5151/9786555501810-07

Roger Bastide, Antonio Candido e a tese interrompida sobre o cururu

2023· book-chapter· es· W4389132548 on OpenAlexaff
William Santana Santos, Max Luiz Gimenes, Luíz Carlos Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenueEditora Blucher eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Education and Society
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Os conhecidos parágrafos iniciais do Prefácio de 1964 de Os parceiros do Rio Bonito recuperam o processo de mudança de objeto, do cururu para a sociedade caipira, que teria se consumado no fim do primeiro semestre de 1953, como indicam anotações no esboço da tese interrompida, intitulada inicialmente Poesia popular e mudança social e depois Poesia popular e estrutura social. Ainda no Prefácio, Antonio Candido informa que teria começado a redigir a nova tese em agosto de 1953 e que a teria concluído em setembro de 1954. Tais dados sugerem que Os parceiros foi escrito em apenas um ano, informação que pode escapar ao leitor. A defesa ocorreria um mês depois, em outubro de 1954.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEditora Blucher eBooksSame topicHistorical Education and SocietyFrench-language works237,207