MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389132949 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v15n6p1

A Memoir on Pseudo-Variational Techniques for Parabolic PDE’s Incorporating Boundary Value Constraints

2023· article· en· W4389132949 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Uchechukwu Opara, Festus Irimisose Arunaye, Philip Olugbenga Mate

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSobolev spacePartial differential equationDimension (graph theory)Simple (philosophy)InferenceTRACE (psycholinguistics)Boundary value problemParabolic partial differential equationMathematical analysisOperator (biology)Applied mathematicsCalculus (dental)Pure mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To enrich existing literature and extend the reach of relevant apt theoretical techniques, an alternative for proxy pseudo-variational analysis of a fundamental class of parabolic Partial Differential Equations (PDE’s) is brought to the fore in this paper. Classical results in Sobolev Space theory are extrapolated with the aid of more current, standard tools from developments in fractional calculus. The high potency of inference from data obtained via the trace boundary operator is proffered, with the simple heat equation in one spatial dimension as a case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.261
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207