MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389133119 · doi:10.1525/ncl.2023.78.3.246

Review: <i>American Mediterraneans: A Study in Geography, History, and Race</i>, by Susan Gillman

2023· article· en· W4389133119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNineteenth-Century Literature · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationHistorySettlement (finance)Art historyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| December 01 2023 Review: American Mediterraneans: A Study in Geography, History, and Race, by Susan Gillman Susan Gillman, American Mediterraneans: A Study in Geography, History, and Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. xvi + 183. $95 cloth; $27.50 paper. Melissa Gniadek Melissa Gniadek University of Toronto Melissa Gniadek is an Associate Professor of English at the University of Toronto. Professor Gniadek is the author of Oceans at Home: Maritime and Domestic Fictions in Nineteenth-Century American Women’s Writing (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021) as well as numerous articles and book chapters on nineteenth-century U.S. engagement with the Pacific and literary engagement with histories of settler colonialism. Currently, Professor Gniadek is at work on a monograph concerned with unsettling temporalities of settlement in nineteenth-century American literature. She is also at work on another project about Herman Melville and trees in global contexts. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Nineteenth-Century Literature (2023) 78 (3): 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1525/ncl.2023.78.3.246 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Melissa Gniadek; Review: American Mediterraneans: A Study in Geography, History, and Race, by Susan Gillman. Nineteenth-Century Literature 1 December 2023; 78 (3): 246–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/ncl.2023.78.3.246 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentNineteenth-Century Literature Search American Mediterraneans begins with what might seem the deceptively simple question “of why, in the Americas, so many bodies of water and land are so frequently compared to the European Mediterranean, both classical and modern” (p. xi). Susan Gillman immediately shows that engaging with this question requires a method of “speculative comparativism” that the term “American Mediterranean itself produces” (p. 15). The work of nineteenth-century Prussian scientist Alexander von Humboldt, who named the Caribbean Méditerranée de l’Amérique, serves as the starting point from which Gillman traces networks of texts that move across the scales of “space, time, and language,” doing “cultural work…that is always fundamentally, if not openly, racial” (p. xi). Reading across a “loose archive of works,” Gillman makes a compelling—indeed, necessary—case for the link between her subject and methodology, as she elaborates the inherently oceanic concept of her title using the transnational, hemispheric, and translation studies approaches... You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it