MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389139464 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.181128

Implementing Modeling Techniques to Formulate a Strategy for Organizational Change Management in Enterprises' Sustainable Development Systems

2023· article· en· W4389139464 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuliia Borutska, Nataliia Mahas, Svitlana Hrebinska, Halyna Yankovska, Вікторія Лакіза

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessSustainable developmentProcess managementOrganizational changeChange management (ITSM)Environmental resource managementEnvironmental sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary aim of this article is to graphically construct change management strategies within the system of enterprise sustainable development.The study focuses on the sustainable development system of an enterprise.The scientific task is the implementation of a new methodological approach to building strategies for managing changes in sustainable development system of enterprise.The research methods involve the use of technologies for constructing two variants of IDEF3 strategies.The IDEF3 method was utilized to capture descriptions of action sequences, enabling a specialist to construct change management strategies within the enterprise's sustainable development system.As a result, two unique examples of change management strategies in enterprise sustainable development system were presented.Consequently, we formed process-oriented and object-oriented strategies for managing changes in the machine-building enterprise's sustainable development system.These strategies allow for the inclusion of all elements of the enterprise's sustainable development in strategy formation.The implications of the study are the formation of a specific methodological approach to the presentation of the strategy for managing changes in the system of sustainable development of an enterprise.The study is limited as it only takes into account the specifics of the sustainable development system within an engineering enterprise.Prospects for further research should be devoted to the analysis of the change management system in the framework of security.The practical value of the results obtained lies in the possibility of using strategy models for top managers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207