MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389139464 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.181128

Implementing Modeling Techniques to Formulate a Strategy for Organizational Change Management in Enterprises' Sustainable Development Systems

2023· article· en· W4389139464 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuliia Borutska, Nataliia Mahas, Svitlana Hrebinska, Halyna Yankovska, Вікторія Лакіза

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessSustainable developmentProcess managementOrganizational changeChange management (ITSM)Environmental resource managementEnvironmental sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary aim of this article is to graphically construct change management strategies within the system of enterprise sustainable development.The study focuses on the sustainable development system of an enterprise.The scientific task is the implementation of a new methodological approach to building strategies for managing changes in sustainable development system of enterprise.The research methods involve the use of technologies for constructing two variants of IDEF3 strategies.The IDEF3 method was utilized to capture descriptions of action sequences, enabling a specialist to construct change management strategies within the enterprise's sustainable development system.As a result, two unique examples of change management strategies in enterprise sustainable development system were presented.Consequently, we formed process-oriented and object-oriented strategies for managing changes in the machine-building enterprise's sustainable development system.These strategies allow for the inclusion of all elements of the enterprise's sustainable development in strategy formation.The implications of the study are the formation of a specific methodological approach to the presentation of the strategy for managing changes in the system of sustainable development of an enterprise.The study is limited as it only takes into account the specifics of the sustainable development system within an engineering enterprise.Prospects for further research should be devoted to the analysis of the change management system in the framework of security.The practical value of the results obtained lies in the possibility of using strategy models for top managers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicComplex Systems and Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207