MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389140730 · doi:10.1115/pvp2023-105251

Organization and Basis of ASME Section XI, Nonmandatory Appendix Y, “Crack Growth Rate Curves”

2023· article· en· W4389140730 on OpenAlexaff
Glenn A. White, Kevin Fuhr, Anees Udyawar, Doug Scarth, Do Jun Shim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsKinectrics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress corrosion crackingCorrosion fatigueParis' lawCrackingMaterials scienceGrowth rateSection (typography)CorrosionMetallurgyBoiling water reactorCrack closureFracture mechanicsPressure vesselAusteniteStress (linguistics)Structural engineeringEngineeringNuclear engineeringComposite materialMathematicsComputer scienceGeometryMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nonmandatory Appendix Y of ASME Section XI presents relationships for fatigue crack growth rates and stress corrosion crack growth rates for austenitic stainless steels, ferritic steels, and nickel alloys for use in analytical evaluations. These crack growth rate equations are needed to predict the crack growth rate for the applicable cracking mechanism, material, and environment. The cracking mechanisms addressed are fatigue in air, fatigue in water environments, stress corrosion cracking, and irradiation-assisted stress corrosion cracking. Boiling water reactor and pressurized water reactor water environments are included. Nonmandatory Appendix Y was introduced within the 2021 Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code as a consolidated repository for crack growth rate equations. A second objective of Appendix Y is to standardize the nomenclature, physical units, and figures associated with the various crack growth rate relations. Changes anticipated for the 2023 Edition include moving all crack growth rate provisions from other nonmandatory Section XI appendices (including Nonmandatory Appendices A and C) into Appendix Y. This paper describes the organization of the 2023 Edition of Appendix Y and documents the source of each equation. Also tabulated are the active Section XI Code Cases that include crack growth rate equations, as well as the most recent status of acceptance by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2080.220

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFatigue and fracture mechanicsFrench-language works237,207