MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389140858 · doi:10.1115/pvp2023-106923

The Effects of Fluid Working Conditions on Flange Face Corrosion

2023· article· en· W4389140858 on OpenAlex
Soroosh Hakimian, Abdel‐Hakim Bouzid, Lucas A. Hof

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGasketFlangeCorrosionMaterials scienceGalvanic cellBolted jointCrevice corrosionComposite materialLeakage (economics)Galvanic corrosionMetallurgyStructural engineeringFinite element methodEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The second most common cause of hydrocarbon leakage is corrosion in offshore platforms. In seawater and hydrocarbon services, bolted flange joints can be susceptible to corrosion at their flange face. The current work considers corrosion of bolted flanged gasketed joints using the COQT fixture (COrrosion Quantification Test) to evaluate corrosion in flange faces. According to the literature, both crevice corrosion and galvanic corrosion widely occur in bolted flanged gasketed connections, creating leakage paths of the pressurized fluid. Leakage failure in bolted flanged gasketed joints can cause hazards to the environment and human safety. Corrosion in bolted gasketed joints was investigated in the literature. However, these studies do not consider the influence of the operating parameters such as fluid flow, pressure, pH, conductivity, temperature, and gasket contact pressure. With the developed COQT fixture, which was introduced in the previous paper, different electrochemical techniques can be applied to measure flange corrosion under controlled test conditions. The polarization technique will be used to measure and compare the corrosion rate of flange at different fluid flow rates, and gasket contact stresses. The flange sample material is ASTM A105, and the gasket material is Teflon. Electrochemical tests are conducted with a solution of 3.5% NaCl. Confocal microscopy is used to visualize the morphology of the damaged zones on the surface, and localize and quantify the pits size caused by corrosion, respectively. Comparing the results of the electrochemical tests and the microscopic studies will identify the most influent factor on the corrosion rate of flanges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it