Quality Control for Ocean Current Measurement Using High-Frequency Direction-Finding Radar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-frequency radars (HFRs) are important for remote sensing of the marine environment due to their ability to provide real-time, wide-coverage, and high-resolution measurements of the ocean surface current, wave height, and wind speed. However, due to the intricate multidimensional processing demands (e.g., time, Doppler, and space) for internal data and effective suppression of external noise, conducting quality control (QC) on radar-measured data is of great importance. In this paper, we first present a comprehensive quality evaluation model for both radial current and synthesized vector current obtained by direction-finding (DF) HFRs. In the proposed model, the quality factor (QF) is calculated for each current cell to evaluate its reliability. The QF for the radial current depends on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and DF factor of the first-order Bragg peak region in the range–Doppler (RD) spectrum, and the QF for the synthesized vector current can be calculated using an error propagation model based on geometric dilution of precision (GDOP). A QC method is then proposed for processing HFR-derived surface current data via the following steps: (1) signal preprocessing is performed to minimize the effect of unwanted external signals such as radio frequency interference and ionospheric clutter; (2) radial currents with low QFs and outliers are removed; (3) the vector currents with low QFs are also removed before spatial smoothing and interpolation. The proposed QC method is validated using a one-month-long dataset collected by the Ocean State Monitoring and Analyzing Radar, model S (OSMAR-S). The improvement in the current quality is proven to be significant. Using the buoy data as ground truth, after applying QC, the correlation coefficients (CCs) of the radial current, synthesized current speed, and synthesized current direction are increased by 4.33~102.91%, 1.04~90.74%, and 1.20~62.67%, respectively, and the root mean square errors (RMSEs) are decreased by 2.51~49.65%, 7.86~27.22%, and 1.68~28.99%, respectively. The proposed QC method has now been incorporated into the operational software (RemoteSiteConsole v1.0.0.65) of OSMAR-S.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".