MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389145829 · doi:10.5944/rhd.vol.8.2023.30754

JENSTAD, Janelle (Dir.). Map of Early Modern London (MOEML). University of Windsor, Ontario, 1999-Actualidad.

2023· article· es· W4389145829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beatriz Sánchez Martín

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Humanidades Digitales · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindsorHumanitiesCartographyArtGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En la reseña, se explica y explora el proyecto Map Of Early Modern London. Se trata de un proyecto de Humanidades Digitales desarrollado por Janelle Jenstad en la Universidad de Victoria (Canadá). El principal objetivo del proyecto es crear un mapa interactivo del famoso Agas Map, uno de los pocos mapas fisicos de Londres que se conservan datado en 1561. A través de enciclopedias, documentación y herramientas como gazetteer, las cuales están en continuo desarrollo, Janelle Jenstad quiere que conozcamos hasta el más mínimo detalle de la vida y sociedad londinense en el siglo XVI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.015
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Humanidades DigitalesSame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207