MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Body and Mind: Feminist Reading of The Pull of the Stars

2023· article· en· W4389146179 on OpenAlex
S - Megha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Conflict Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFamineReading (process)IrishPandemicHistoryVariety (cybernetics)Unit (ring theory)Gender studiesSociologyPolitical scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyLawInfectious disease (medical specialty)ArchaeologyLinguisticsMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diseases are fundamentally a human trait. Pandemics, on the other hand, create more intense experiences than world wars. They then become part of the emotional history. Most of the plagues that have ravaged the world have given rise to a variety of expressions and plagues have also found a special place in novel literature. The novel The Pull of the Stars by renowned Irish-Canadian author Emma Donoghue stands out among recently released pandemic literature. The novel takes place in a 1918 maternity unit in Dublin, a city devastated by the Great Famine, World War I, and the 1916 Irish Rebellion. This paper is a feminist reading of the novel The Pull of the Stars and further it explores the impact of pandemic on the marginalized body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.295
GPT teacher head0.599
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it