MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389147641 · doi:10.4000/rfp.12918

Influence des buts de performance, de l’évitement de la maîtrise et de la timidité sur l’engagement dans les études universitaires

2023· article· fr· W4389147641 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Plantade-Gipch, Charles Martin‐Krumm, Alain Blanchet, Anita Müller, Fleur Le Roux, Hélène Maire

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française de pédagogie · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans l’enseignement supérieur, l’engagement des étudiants influence largement leur réussite. Cette étude vise à évaluer si l’orientation de performance, ainsi que la timidité, influencent cet engagement. 394 étudiants français de premier et deuxième cycles universitaires ont rempli des échelles de timidité, de buts de performance et d’évitement de la maîtrise, ainsi que d’engagement dans les études. Les résultats indiquent que les buts de performance prédisent l’enthousiasme dans les études. Également, la timidité est médiatrice du lien entre le but de performance et l’engagement de l’étudiant. La recherche propose divers moyens de favoriser l’engagement dans les études.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française de pédagogieSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207