Prognostic algorithms for post-discharge readmission and mortality among mother-infant dyads: an observational study protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: In low-income country settings, the first six weeks after birth remain a critical period of vulnerability for both mother and newborn. Despite recommendations for routine follow-up after delivery and facility discharge, few mothers and newborns receive guideline recommended care during this period. Prediction modelling of post-delivery outcomes has the potential to improve outcomes for both mother and newborn by identifying high-risk dyads, improving risk communication, and informing a patient-centered approach to postnatal care interventions. This study aims to derive post-discharge risk prediction algorithms that identify mother-newborn dyads who are at risk of re-admission or death in the first six weeks after delivery at a health facility. Methods: This prospective observational study will enroll 7,000 mother-newborn dyads from two regional referral hospitals in southwestern and eastern Uganda. Women and adolescent girls aged 12 and above delivering singletons and twins at the study hospitals will be eligible to participate. Candidate predictor variables will be collected prospectively by research nurses. Outcomes will be captured six weeks following delivery through a follow-up phone call, or an in-person visit if not reachable by phone. Two separate sets of prediction models will be built, one set of models for newborn outcomes and one set for maternal outcomes. Derivation of models will be based on optimization of the area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) and specificity using an elastic net regression modelling approach. Internal validation will be conducted using 10-fold cross-validation. Our focus will be on the development of parsimonious models (5-10 predictor variables) with high sensitivity (>80%). AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity will be reported for each model, along with positive and negative predictive values. Discussion: The current recommendations for routine postnatal care are largely absent of benefit to most mothers and newborns due to poor adherence. Data-driven improvements to postnatal care can facilitate a more patient-centered approach to such care. Increasing digitization of facility care across low-income settings can further facilitate the integration of prediction algorithms as decision support tools for routine care, leading to improved quality and efficiency. Such strategies are urgently required to improve newborn and maternal postnatal outcomes. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier (NCT05730387).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.047 | 0.053 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".