MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389151649 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35430-4_1

Introduction: To Be More Relevant the Field of Science Education Needs to Be Less Relevant

2023· book-chapter· en· W4389151649 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Tolbert, Jesse Bazzul

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave studies in education and the environment · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisciplineIdeologyEngineering ethicsAnthropoceneField (mathematics)SociologyScience educationPedagogySocial sciencePolitical scienceEnvironmental ethicsEngineeringPhilosophyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this introductory chapter, we illustrate the importance of transdisciplinary and justice-oriented approaches to science education. We first challenge the rigid disciplinary boundaries of the fields of science and science education, and then lay out how Volume 2 of Reimagining Science Education in the Anthropocene offers creative diversions from the disciplining structures of ideologically conservative fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave studies in education and the environmentSame topicClimate Change Communication and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207