MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389151843 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35430-4_19

In Conversation with Max Liboiron: Towards an Everyday, Anticolonial Feminist Science (Education) Practice

2023· book-chapter· en· W4389151843 on OpenAlexaff
Max Liboiron, Marc Higgins, Sara Tolbert

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave studies in education and the environment · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRace, Genetics, and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationZoomSociologyMedia studiesPedagogyCommunicationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This interview with Max Liboiron took place over Zoom in May 2022. Marc Higgins and Sara Tolbert (interviewers) have been interested in Max’s work on anticolonial and feminist science as well as the work of the CLEAR Lab, and the implications for science education. They invited Max to participate in this online dialogue about these topics, among others. In the conversation that is edited and transcribed in this chapter, Max elaborates on what it means to do and teach anticolonial, feminist, and land-based science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave studies in education and the environmentSame topicRace, Genetics, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207