MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389151860 · doi:10.1002/cjce.25137

Phenomenological‐based model of direct blue 2 adsorption on corncob in a fixed‐bed

2023· article· en· W4389151860 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nathaly Presiga‐Posada, Hernán Álvarez, Angelina Hormaza

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdsorptionMass transferFreundlich equationThermal diffusivityMass transfer coefficientDiffusionWork (physics)Materials scienceThermodynamicsChromatographyPacked bedPhase (matter)LangmuirMechanicsChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Physical chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This work presents a phenomenologically based semi‐physical model (PBSM) for the liquid–solid adsorption process, which has been experimentally validated. Two modes of operation of adsorption of direct blue 2 dye (DB2) on corn cobs in a fixed bed are discussed by applying the PBSM. The first mode of operation is the typical continuous liquid flow, whereas the second is a semicontinuous mode with the recirculation of liquid leaving the column. These modes of operation were used to illustrate different ways in which the system reaches equilibrium conditions. The equilibrium distribution curve (EDC) for low DB2 concentration was reached with the best fit using the Langmuir–Freundlich model (). The local mass transfer coefficient for the solid phase was evaluated by the PBSM deduction, and subsequently, the diffusivity of the surface solid was experimentally evaluated through comparison in terms of the PBSM. Regardless of the mode of operation, surface diffusion is associated with only the nature of the adsorbent material rather than the concentration of the liquid phase. In addition, the PBSM exhibited liquid and solid concentration changes at different points in the column. Moreover, different operating curves of the process were constructed and validated, exhibiting similar results when comparing the predictions of the model and the experimental data. These findings support the strength of the constructed model, enabling its extension to other adsorbent–dye systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering→Same topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal→French-language works237,207→