MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389152298 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35430-4_22

Conclusion: Amplifying Science Education Research with(in) a Minor Key

2023· book-chapter· en· W4389152298 on OpenAlexaff
Maria F. G. Wallace, Marc Higgins

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave studies in education and the environment · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPosthumanist Ethics and Activism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmediacyMinor (academic)Science educationKey (lock)SociologyPedagogyEpistemologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Science educators are invited to consider the always-already capacity of Nature to address some of the persistent dilemmas confronting our work as science educators in this contemporary moment—a minor language. By enacting science education research in a minor tenor (as opposed to majoritarian thought), deterritorialization, political immediacy, and collective enunciation become intentional practices of grappling (as opposed to mere byproducts). Images of what is possible for science education research within a new tenor are illuminated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave studies in education and the environmentSame topicPosthumanist Ethics and ActivismFrench-language works237,207