MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389153251 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v65i3.56581

Educating the 21st Century Language Teacher

2019· article· en· W4389153251 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunicative competenceCompetence (human resources)HumanitiesPsychologyPedagogyLibrary sciencePhilosophySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study engages with how prospective teachers of English (PTEs) conceptualize intercultural communicative competence (ICC). In particular, we focus on the underlying sources that influence the development of ICC for pre-service teachers in a teacher education program in Turkey. A self-assessment scale and semi-structured interviews were used as data collection tools. The results reveal that the definition of ICC is vague among the PTEs, and their understanding of it is insufficient. In particular, while they can provide a definition of ICC, they rarely mention characteristics beyond linguistic competence. Further to this, travel and exchange programs, as well as peer interactions are the primary sources of ICC as reported by PTEs; while academic courses have no statistically significant contribution. Keywords: intercultural communicative competence; prospective teachers of English; perception; contributing sources; academic program Cette étude porte sur la façon dont les futurs enseignants d’anglais conçoivent la compétence communicative interculturelle (CCI). Plus particulièrement, nous nous penchons sur les sources sous-jacentes qui influencent le développement de la CCI chez les enseignants en formation dans un programme de formation à l’enseignement en Turquie. Une grille d’autoévaluation et des entrevues semi-structurées ont servi d’outils de collecte de données. Les résultats indiquent que la définition de la CCI est vague chez les futurs enseignants d’anglais et qu’ils possèdent insuffisamment de connaissances à ce sujet. Notamment, même s’ils sont en mesure de fournir une définition de la CCI, ils en notent rarement les caractéristiques autres que la compétence linguistique. De plus, comme sources principales de CCI, les futurs enseignants d’anglais nomment les voyages, les programmes d’échange et les interactions avec les pairs; les cours académiques n’y contribuent pas de façon statistiquement significative. Mots clés : compétence communicative interculturelle; futurs enseignants d’anglais; perception; sources contributrices; programme académique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1710.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it