MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389153877 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.181123

Influence of Rainfall Variability on Groundwater Recharge in Northern Cross River State, Nigeria

2023· article· en· W4389153877 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. A. Abua, Devalsam Imoke Eni, A.I. Iwara, Evaristus Idaga Igelle, O. E. Egbai, S. W. Ashua, Bassey J. Bassey, Uquetan Ibor Uquetan, S. Owolum, Iheoma O. Iwuaanyawu, Christiana O. Akpoduado

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwater rechargeHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceGroundwaterWater resource managementGeologyAquiferGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study examined rainfall variability pattern and its implication on groundwater recharge in Obudu.Data on rainfall was obtained from the Nigerian Meteorological Agency office Obudu Dam, while Chaturvedi Empirical Method was employed to generate data on groundwater recharge.Results from the analysis revealed that rainfall correlated positively with groundwater recharge (r=0.90;p>0.05).The long term means from 1982-2012 for the region was 2138.0mm.Rainfall of 2001 recorded the highest negative departure of 41.1 per cent below the mean (below normal), and in 2012, it recorded the highest positive departure of 56.1 per cent above normal.The result revealed that rainfall events below the long-term mean would result in low recharge which could pose serious challenges to water resources management.The study recommended the need to create an effective rainwater capture and storage system to reduce water scarcity problem during period of shortage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207