MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389154058 · doi:10.1522/rhe.v7i3.1583

La participation parentale à l’établissement des plans d’intervention d’élèves en difficulté d’adaptation

2023· article· fr· W4389154058 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jeanne Chouinard, Nancy Gaudreau, Line Massé

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue hybride de l éducation · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le plan d’intervention (PI) constitue un outil de planification mis en place pour favoriser la réussite des élèves présentant des difficultés d’adaptation. Dans cette optique, la participation des parents est attendue de la part de l’école. Quelle forme celle-ci prend-elle ? Quels facteurs facilitent ou entravent la participation parentale ? Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche qualitative menée au Québec auprès de 29 parents d’élèves présentant des difficultés d’adaptation. Les analyses réalisées permettent de dégager certaines recommandations pour favoriser une plus grande participation des parents à la démarche du PI de leur enfant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue hybride de l éducationSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207