Sustainable Practices in West Java Hotels: Perspectives from the Hotel Association, Hotel Management, and Visitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the role of hotel associations in encouraging sustainable practices and analyze the implementation of green hotels in West Java from the perspective of hotel management and visitors.Despite many hotels making efforts to reduce their environmental impact, gaps and challenges still exist in their pursuit of sustainability.The research emphasizes the importance of collaboration among hotel associations, management, and visitors to promote sustainable practices.This study employs a qualitative approach and survey methods, executing in-depth interviews with 37 participants at the Indonesian Hotel and Restaurant Association's office in West Java, as well as six hotels, ranging from non-star to 5star establishments.A combination of convenience and purposive sampling techniques was employed.The findings indicated that hotel associations serve as catalysts in the tourism sector, successfully fulfilling their responsibilities by adhering to standard operating procedures and promoting sustainable practices.Hotel management adopts the green concept by establishing policies that comply with standards and regulations, such as building design, energy efficiency, sustainable product selection, and effective waste management practices.Hotels can benefit from a positive brand image and the potential for financial gains through sustainability initiatives and industry trends.Visitors express their support for the implementation of green hotels through their positive perceptions.Future studies are encouraged to further investigate consumer behavior and decision-making related to the selection of green hotels, specific factors influencing travelers' choices, and variations in preferences across different market segments and regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".