Stein Variational Belief Propagation for Multi-Robot Coordination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decentralized coordination for multi-robot systems involves planning in challenging, high-dimensional spaces. The planning problem is particularly challenging in the presence of obstacles and different sources of uncertainty such as inaccurate dynamic models and sensor noise. In this paper, we introduce Stein Variational Belief Propagation (SVBP), a novel algorithm for performing inference over nonparametric marginal distributions of nodes in a graph. We apply SVBP to multi-robot coordination by modelling a robot swarm as a graphical model and performing inference for each robot. We demonstrate our algorithm on a simulated multi-robot perception task, and on a multi-robot planning task within a Model-Predictive Control (MPC) framework, on both simulated and real-world mobile robots. Our experiments show that SVBP represents multi-modal distributions better than sampling-based or Gaussian baselines, resulting in improved performance on perception and planning tasks. Furthermore, we show that SVBP's ability to represent diverse trajectories for decentralized multi-robot planning makes it less prone to deadlock scenarios than leading baselines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".