MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Decarbonisation pathways of the cement production process via hydrogen and oxy-combustion

2023· article· en· W4389159981 on OpenAlexaff
Aidong Yang, Daya Ram Nhuchhen

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Conversion and Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Northwest TerritoriesCanadian Energy Research InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionNatural gasFossil fuelWaste managementEnvironmental scienceCalcinationGreenhouse gasHydrogen productionCarbon capture and storage (timeline)HydrogenChemistryEngineeringClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decarbonising cement production is of profound importance for meeting global greenhouse gas emission reduction targets and mitigating the impact of climate change. This study evaluates various technical options for achieving deep decarbonisation in a clinker production facility by utilising hydrogen (H2) as an alternative fuel to replace fossil fuels and by integrating an oxy-combustion technique with carbon capture and storage (CCS). Using Aspen Plus process simulations, we examined the extent of decarbonisation and assessed the thermal and electrical energy demands. This was achieved by incorporating an amine-absorption-based CO2 capture to a conventional natural gas fuelled reference plant, implementing oxyfuel-combustion of natural gas, and exploring four different scenarios for replacing fossil fuel with H2. In these scenarios, H2 was assumed to be produced through on-site water electrolysis, which also supplied oxygen for oxyfuel combustion, potentially eliminating the need for an air separation unit (ASU). The processes utilizing H2, except for the case of indirectly heated pre-calcination, employed oxyfuel combustion. The results indicate that the natural gas-fuelled oxyfuel-combustion process had the lowest total energy input at 4.92 GJ/t clinker, approximately 35% lower than that of the reference plant. Processes using H2 reduced energy demand by 11% in the H2-d scenario and 33% in the H2-a scenario. However, the process with indirect calcination required 6.24 GJ/t clinker, about 8% more H2 fuel than direct calcination but helped eliminate the need for an ASU. The results also reveal that greater H2 substitutions led to higher total process energy requirements due to the inefficiencies of the electrolysis process. While the H2-using processes could reduce the CO2 generation by up to 559 kgCO2/t clinker, this represents only about 27.6% of the CO2 reductions relative to the reference plant. These findings underscore the limitation of fuel substitution alone in cement production and emphasize the need for innovations in raw materials and the adoption of CCS to achieve deeper decarbonisation in cement industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy Conversion and ManagementSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207