Exploring the Potential of Qutrits for Quantum Optimization of Graph Coloring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent hardware demonstrations and advances in circuit compilation have made quantum computing with higher- dimensional systems (qudits) on near-term devices an attractive possibility. Some problems have more natural or optimal en- codings using qudits over qubits. We explore this potential by formulating graph 3-coloring, a well-known and difficult problem with practical applications, using qutrits, and solve it using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). Qutrit- based cost and mixer Hamiltonians are constructed along with appropriate quantum circuits using qutrit gates. We run noiseless simulations using PennyLane to compare the formulation against qubit-based QAOA, and analyze the solution quality and resources required. Preliminary results show that the qutrit encoding finds more accurate solutions with a comparable set of hyperparameters, uses half as many qudits, and has a notably smaller circuit depth per layer than an efficient qubit encoding. This work suggests that qutrits may be useful in solving some problems on near-term devices, however further work is required to assess their potential in a noisy environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".