MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389166590 · doi:10.56952/igs-2023-0226

Effect of H2 on Salt Caverns During Fast Cycling Injection-Production: Laboratory Characterization & Storage Integrity Workflow

2023· article· en· W4389166590 on OpenAlexaff
J. Younes, Seyed Mohammad Hosein Seyed Ghafouri, Giovanni Grasselli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyEnvironmental scienceCyclingWorkflowHydrogen storagePopulationEnergy storageWaste managementProcess engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringHydrogenChemistryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The expanding global population and clean energy demand suggests utilizing renewable energy from sources such as wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, hydro and biofuel. The intermittent nature of such sources has propelled a need for efficient storage. Hydrogen (H2), being a carbon-free energy carrier, emerged as a potential solution, but it will require large volume to be stored to meet the demand. Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) is preferred given its low cost, tightness, and safety. Although existing UHS facilities have safely operated for over 40 years, the expected demand growth will require frequent injection-withdrawal cycles. This review provides an examination of the processes involved during H2 cycling. Firstly, the different cyclic tests are classified based on loading path, frequency, type and environment conditions. Then the behavior of rock salt under cyclic loading is discussed. Detailed attention is given to the chemical interaction between H2 and salt, covering experimental research concerning UHS in salt caverns. The review ends by presenting a laboratory experimental workflow involving the coupled processes within UHS operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→