MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389166601 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3675303/v1

QSPR analysis of drugs for anti-hypertension using degree based topological indices through M-polynomial and NM-polynomial

2023· preprint· en· W4389166601 on OpenAlexaff
A Pradeepa, P. Arathi

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsActua
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantitative structure–activity relationshipMolecular descriptorPolynomialMathematicsDegree (music)Molecular graphGraphMathematical chemistryTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceMachine learningDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There are several uses for chemical graph theory in experimental science, medicine, drug development, and clinical studies. The statistical characteristics of medications have been developed and determined by topological descriptors. To extract a quantitative structural property/activity relationship (QSPR/QSAR), these indices can be employed alone or in conjunction with other numeric descriptors. Scientists are interested in investigating the chemical network's topology through QSPR investigations, employing specific mathematical constants and parameters derived from the molecular structures of networks. This paper focuses on using the M-polynomials and NM-polynomials of nine anti-hypertensive drugs to compute several degree-based topological indices. It is further shown that these topological descriptors have an excellent correlation with the physicochemical properties of considered anti-hypertensive drugs. Different statistical parameters are analyzed based on the collected results and conclusions are made for each parameter. Researchers exploring drug science in the pharmaceutical sector can utilize the findings to acquire a better understanding of the physical characteristics of newly discovered drugs that are used to treat various diseases. Mathematics Subject classification (2020): 92E10; 05C09; 05C31; 05C90; 05C92

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.371
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.111 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207