MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389169310 · doi:10.1109/tns.2023.3337839

Ultra-Large Silicon Diode for Characterizing Low-Intensity Radiation Environments

2023· article· en· W4389169310 on OpenAlexafffund
Kacper Biłko, Rubén García Alía, Sylvain Girard, Mario Sacristán Barbero, Matteo Cecchetto, C. Bélanger-Champagne, Matteo Brucoli, Salvatore Danzeca, Alex Hands, Pedro Martín‐Holgado, Yolanda Morilla, Amor Romero-Maestre, Marc Sebban, M. Widorski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersEuropean CommissionTRIUMF
KeywordsSiliconDiodeOptoelectronicsRadiationMaterials scienceIntensity (physics)PhysicsEngineering physicsEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present applications of a large commercial silicon diode (50 cm$^{2}\,\,\times 500\,\,{\mu }\text{m}$) for monitoring low-intensity radiation fields, together with benchmarks via Monte Carlo simulations. After energy calibration with monoenergetic proton and alpha beams in the 2–8-MeV range, we show that the detector is capable of measuring atmospheric radiation at the ground level, not only in terms of a total number of events but also through their energy deposition distribution. Focusing on the atmospheric-like neutron spectrum, we prove that the diode detection cross Section is more than five orders of magnitude larger with respect to static random access memory (SRAM)-based solutions and highlight the potential use cases in the accelerator’s radiation environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicRadiation Effects in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207