Weakly Supervised Learning for Pixel-Level Sea Ice Concentration Extraction Using AI4Arctic Sea Ice Challenge Dataset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-resolution sea ice concentration (SIC) maps are critical to support various applications, e.g., climate modeling, ship navigation, and activities in Northern communities. However, operational mapping of SIC based on expert annotations is coarse in spatial resolution and time-consuming to prepare. Although many convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods have been proposed for automated sea ice mapping from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery in recent years, the lack of pixel-based labels for model training hinders them from producing high-resolution reliable mapping results. To overcome this challenge, this letter presents a novel weakly supervised learning approach that generates pixel-level SIC prediction using coarse region/polygon-level SIC ground truth. Specifically, a novel region-level loss function is designed to enable direct use of regional/polygon SIC values in ice charts for the training of a U-Net-based model. This avoids the errors in transferring region-level SIC values to pixel-level ground-truth SIC values effectively and allows the generation of pixel-level SIC and sea ice extent (SIE) estimates. The proposed approach is evaluated on the recently published AI4Arctic Sea Ice Challenge Dataset with over 500 Sentinel-1 SAR scenes, ancillary data, and associated ice charts. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the weakly supervised model in producing pixel-level high-resolution SIC maps that are consistent with ice charts and visual interpretation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".