MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389169646 · doi:10.1109/icjece.2023.3312590

Compact Coradiator MIMO Antenna for Super Wideband Applications

2023· article· en· W4389169646 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. Srividhya, P. Jothilakshmi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandMIMOTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a compact planar circular monopole antenna with a shared radiator for super wideband (SWB) applications compatible with multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) configurations. The novelty lies in the coradiator being a simple circular structure enhanced with stepped impedance feed. The antenna uses a partial ground with a stepped system designed over an RO3003 substrate, with an overall dimension of 29$\times$29$\times$0.8 mm$^3$. The antenna operates over a wideband from 4 to 50 GHz and beyond. The system works in dual polarization with a shared radiator and offers a peak gain value of 7.15 dBi with a high efficiency of 80%–97%. The proposed antenna provides stunning isolation between the dual orthogonal ports of the shared radiator. The diversity performance of the antenna in terms of envelope correlation coefficient (ECC$<$0.002), multiplexing efficiency (ME$=$$-$3.111 dB), diversity gain (DG$>$9.995 dB), and mean effective gain (MEG$=$$-$3.01 dB) are also studied and analyzed. The designed structure is fabricated, and antenna parameters are measured. The proposed design meets the desired values, and measured parameters agree with the simulated ones, rendering the antenna a suitable candidate for SWB-MIMO applications. Combining the two standards would help breakthrough in wireless communication. With its wide bandwidth, the proposed design finds scope in Internet of Things (IoT), future 5G, and emerging 6G technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207