MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389177348 · doi:10.7554/elife.91766.1.sa2

eLife Assessment: Netrin signaling mediates survival of dormant epithelial ovarian cancer cells

2023· peer-review· en· W4389177348 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan Topisirović

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCancer researchOvarian cancerNetrinMetastasisCancer cellDormancyCancerReceptorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dormancy in cancer is a clinical state in which residual disease remains undetectable for a prolonged duration. At a cellular level, rare cancer cells cease proliferation and survive chemotherapy and disseminate disease. We utilized a suspension culture model of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cell dormancy and devised a novel CRISPR screening approach to identify genetic requirements for cell survival under growth arrested and spheroid culture conditions. In addition, multiple RNA-seq comparisons were used to identify genes whose expression correlates with survival in dormancy. Combined, these approaches discover the Netrin signaling pathway as critical to dormant HGSOC cell survival. We demonstrate that Netrin-1 and -3, UNC5H receptors, DCC and other fibronectin receptors induce low level ERK activation to promote survival in dormant conditions. Furthermore, we determine that Netrin-1 and -3 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in HGSOC and demonstrate their overexpression elevates cell survival in dormant conditions. Lastly, Netrin-1 or -3 overexpression contributes to greater spread of disease in a xenograft model of abdominal dissemination. This study highlights Netrin signaling as a key mediator HGSOC cancer cell dormancy and metastasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingFrench-language works237,207