<i>Campylobacter jejuni</i> uses energy taxis and a dehydrogenase enzyme for <scp>l</scp> -fucose chemotaxis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Campylobacter jejuni is a leading cause of bacterial diarrhea worldwide, and infection in infants is associated with growth stunting in low- and middle-income countries. Approximately half of all C. jejuni isolates are asaccharolytic, while the remainder encode enzymes capable of l -fucose catabolism. Our previous study suggested that breastfed infants originating from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia were colonized less frequently with l -fucose-metabolizing C. jejuni isolates compared to asaccharolytic strains. We also showed that FucX is an l -fucose dehydrogenase that binds to its NADP + cofactor even in the absence of l -fucose and that this enzyme is sufficient for l -fucose chemotaxis when introduced into strains lacking the metabolic pathway. This study indicates that FucX may influence l -fucose chemotaxis by increasing cellular NADPH/NADP + ratios, which subsequently affect the energy taxis components, CetABC that respond to shifting gradients of electron acceptors and donors. Furthermore, C. jejuni CetAB and CetAC can complement Escherichia coli aerotaxis. Our data support a model in which the shift in NADP + levels, impacted by the FucX dehydrogenase, affects chemotaxis in response to l -fucose. This swimming behavior can be phenocopied with a homologous l -fucose dehydrogenase from Burkholderia multivorans . Taken together, our work provides a possible explanation for why l -fucose-metabolizing C. jejuni isolates swim away from intestinal epithelial cells toward free fucose in the lumen where they are subsequently cleared by breastfed infants. IMPORTANCE In this study, we identify a separate role for the Campylobacter jejuni l -fucose dehydrogenase in l -fucose chemotaxis and demonstrate that this mechanism is not only limited to C. jejuni but is also present in Burkholderia multivorans . We now hypothesize that l -fucose energy taxis may contribute to the reduction of l -fucose-metabolizing strains of C. jejuni from the gastrointestinal tract of breastfed infants, selecting for isolates with increased colonization potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".