MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metalens-Based Compressed Ultracompact Femtophotography: Analytical Modeling and Simulations

2023· article· en· W4389190097 on OpenAlexaff
Miguel Márquez, Giacomo Balistreri, Roberto Morandotti, Luca Razzari, Jinyang Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrafast Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressed sensingMaterials scienceComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-shot 2-dimensional optical imaging of transient phenomena is indispensable for numerous areas of study. Among existing techniques, compressed ultrafast photography (CUP) using a chirped ultrashort pulse as active illumination can acquire nonrepetitive time-evolving events at hundreds of trillions of frames per second. However, the bulky size and conventional configurations limit its reliability and application scopes. Superdispersive metalenses offer a promising solution for an ultracompact design with a stable performance by integrating the functions of a focusing lens and dispersive optical components into a single device. Nevertheless, existing metalens designs, typically optimized for the full visible spectrum with a relatively low spectral resolution, cannot be readily applied to active-illumination CUP. To address these limitations, here, we propose single-shot compressed ultracompact femtophotography (CUF) that synergically combines the fields of nanophotonics, optical imaging, compressed sensing, and deep learning. We develop the theory of CUF’s data acquisition composed of temporal–spectral mapping, spatial encoding, temporal shearing, and spatiotemporal integration. We also develop CUF’s image reconstruction via deep learning. Moreover, we design and evaluate CUF’s crucial components—a static binary transmissive mask, a superdispersive metalens, and a 2-dimensional sensor. Finally, using numerical simulations, CUF’s feasibility is verified using 2 synthetic scenes: an ultrafast beam sweeping across a surface and the propagation of a terahertz Cherenkov wave.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrafast ScienceSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207