Within Double Restraint: The Dialectics & Aesthetics of Erotic [Re]presentation in African Cinema
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Within Double Restraint” advocates for the application of eroticism as an analytical lens in the study of African cinema. This thesis unveils representations of sexuality and the nude female form in African cinema. One of the most useful concepts to understand the problematic of erotic representation in African cinema is the notion of ‘double restraint’. Reflecting itself through a form of scopophobia, a restrained response to its communities’ moral codes, and the West’s voyeuristic and fetishistic scopic intrusion towards the Black body. Protectionist conceptions towards sexuality respond to colonialism's legacies establishing stereotypical tropes of an hypersexual African physicality. Although, by bringing attention back to pre-colonial oral traditions, we can begin to redefine these limits of moral transgressions. And reflectively discover whether Black African cineastes choose to adopt them. Relying on indigenous cultures, “Beyond Double Restraint” contradicts the present to reposition eros as an “African” mode of film theoretical discourse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".