MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389191896 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15782

Thermo-Elastic mechanics of Morphing Lattice Structures with Application in Shape Optimization of BLI Engine Intakes

2023· dissertation· en· W4389191896 on OpenAlexafffund
Padmassun Rajakareyar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsMorphingMechanicsMaterials sciencePressure dropDuct (anatomy)Offset (computer science)AerodynamicsAirflowMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysicsComputer scienceAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The boundary layer ingesting (BLI) engine configuration has been theoretically proven to reduce fuel burn compared to conventional engine configuration. This reduced fuel burn, can be potentially offset by reduced stability and efficiency of the fan stages due to the distorted flow. This thesis presents a novel shape morphing strategy of a BLI engine’s duct employing 3D lattice materials. The aircraft's intake engine duct morphs from an ideal shape with minimized flow distortion to a shape that optimizes pressure recovery. The duct was modeled using bi-material lattices with varying elastic, thermal conductivity and thermal expansion properties. The lattices and the external thermal boundary were varied functionally while subjected to convective and aerodynamic boundary conditions. The shape morphing was achieved which targeted radial expansion of the ducts where majority of the duct sections are morphed to a shape that is within 1% of the duct diameter of the targeted optimum shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207