MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389191913 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15726

Optimal Computational Task Offloading to a Edge Server with Firm Deadlines

2023· dissertation· en· W4389191913 on OpenAlexaff
Wesley Mandoly Araujo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMarkov decision processCloudletDynamic programmingCurse of dimensionalityMathematical optimizationTask (project management)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionSignal processingDistributed computingState spaceComputationMarkov processReal-time computingDigital signal processingCloud computingAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer hardwareEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A system consists of a signal processing unit that has limited signal processing capabilities.Signal data entering the system constitute multiple segments that all have a corresponding deadline to be successfully processed or expires.The processing unit is able to offload data to a cloudlet with intermittent availability for remote processing.The goal in this system is to describe an optimal offloading policy.A Markov Decision Process (MDP) is used to model the aforementioned system and a Dynamic Programming (DP) equation is used to describe an optimal policy.This DP equation suffers from the "Curse of Dimensionality" which renders its computations intractable.A result is presented that allows one to evaluate this DP equation over a finite subset of the system state space.Properties of the optimal policy are described which can further reduce the computational load.Finally, numerical results are presented to verify the theoretical results.I am deeply indebted to my colleague the post-doc research assistant Khai Doan for spending his time to discuss what to write in this thesis and for his incredible support as we worked tirelessly together to obtain the lean state result and several numerical results.Without him, this thesis would not have come to fruition.I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Ioannis Lambadaris for his subtle but deep insights in stochastic optimal control theory.Some small moments that may seem insignificant to him, such as when we discussed the representation of the state of the system, changed my perspective on how to think and approach problems involving the Markov Decision Process framework.He also helped improve the precision I need for thinking and writing.And lastly I would like to thank Professor Yannis Viniotis, Professor Evangelos Kranakis, and Thiago Da Silva Gomides.I would like to thank all three of them for meeting virtually, along with Professor Lambadaris and Khai, to discuss our research problems.I would like to thank Professor Kranakis for his major contribution for the proof that the number of possible reduced states is the Catalan number.And finally I would like to thank Professor Viniotis for dedicating hours of his personal time to provide his great wisdom and deep insights on discrete-time systems in order to address subtle problems that I and Khai had.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207