MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389192166 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15659

Using Automated Facial Recognition to Select Fillers for Eyewitness Identification Lineups

2023· dissertation· en· W4389192166 on OpenAlexaff
Lauren E. Thompson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDeception detection and forensic psychology
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuspectEyewitness identificationSimilarity (geometry)Identification (biology)PsychologyRecallArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceCognitive psychologyData miningCriminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most importantly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Joanna Pozzulo, for your support, guidance, advice, and positivity throughout the years.Since the start of my Master's degree 7 years ago, you have done nothing but express the utmost confidence in me and that is, undoubtably, a major reason why I have reached this milestone today.You have provided me with so so many opportunities over the years which have greatly contributed to my research, teaching, and mentoring skills -for that, I can't thank you enough.I feel very lucky to have been able to work with you for so long, and I look forward to our continued collaboration in the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDeception detection and forensic psychologyFrench-language works237,207