MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389192168 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15697

Four Papers in Empirical Economics

2023· dissertation· en· W4389192168 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Derek Luke Mikola

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographic economicsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Consumption (sociology)ConfidentialityGeographyDemographyMedicinePolitical scienceEconomicsSociologyDiseaseLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Guns.Civilian ownership of firearms is a contentious political issue.We use national measures of firearm licenses and the total number of registered and restricted firearms collected by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) to revisit the relationships guns may have with homicides, suicides, and crime.Using fixed effects models at different geographic levels, we estimate the impacts of guns on deaths, suicides, and firearms-related crimes for urban Canada between 2013 and 2019.We find that increasing other-restricted guns (neither rifles nor handguns) by about 50 (per 100, 000) increases firearms-related deaths by about 0.1 (per 100, 000).Other-restricted guns are also increasing firearms-related deaths whose intent are classified as assaults or self-harms.Licenses are generally unrelated to the different firearms-related deaths.Effects of different firearms types and different licenses on firearms-related crimes are heterogeneous based on the different crimes considered.Many of our coefficient estimates are small in magnitude, suggesting large changes in guns or licenses in a heavily-related, Canadian context, would be necessary to reduce firearms-related deaths. COVID-19 and Labour Markets.In this paper, we study the effect of COVID-19 on the labour market and reported mental health of Canadians.To better understand the effect of the pandemic on the labour market, we build indexes for whether workers: (i) are relatively more exposed to disease, (ii) work in proximity to co-workers, (iii) are essential workers and (iv) can easily work remotely.Our estimates suggest that the impact of COVID-19 was significantly more severe for workers that work in proximity to co-workers and those more exposed to disease who are not in the health sector, while the effects are less severe for essential workers and workers that can work remotely.Last, using the Canadian Perspective Survey Series, we observe that reported mental health is significantly lower among some of the most affected workers such as women and less-educated workers.We also document that those who were absent from work because of COVID-19 are more concerned with meeting their financial obligations and with losing their job than those who continue working outside their home.College Graduates.Despite the rapid increase in the returns to higher education witnessed in the labor market over the past few decades, there has also been a marked increase in the share of individuals who drop out of college or university.iii Several Canadian provincial governments introduced graduate retention tax credits available to students after their graduation.Credit availability was tied to students successfully completing their education with the aim of increasing the local stock of human capital by discouraging cross-province migration.We analyze the efficacy of the graduate retention tax credits within a difference-in-difference framework using confidential data from both administrative tax records and longitudinal surveys.Graduate retention credits were unable to decrease internal migration but were able to reduce the interest graduates paid on their loans.Supervised Consumption Sites.Opioid related deaths are a major issue facing policy makers due to their dramatic increase over the past two decades in both Canada and the United States.While supervised consumption sites (SCSs) are a policy tool for harm reduction in Canada, they may also negatively affect communities via increased crime.Moreover, their relatively infrequent use as a policy instrument leaves them largely unexplored by economists.This study uses variation in site openings between 2014 and 2019 in Toronto to estimate their impact on reported crime.My two-way fixed effects models show quarterly crimes increases in the total number of reported crimes for those neighbourhoods where a site opens.The increases are mainly due to assaults and break and enters which show quarterly increases in levels by 68 and 75 reported crimes (per 100, 000), respectively.My event studies, however, show no changes in reported crimes in the three quarters following site openings.Clear effects of the impacts of SCSs on reported crime are difficult to determine due to various limitations.Additional quantitative and qualitative research would better guide policymakers about the benefits and costs of SCSs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.013
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealth disparities and outcomes→French-language works237,207→