MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389193432 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15779

Secured Scalable Blockchain Networks for Trustworthy Distributed Deep Learning in VANETs

2023· dissertation· en· W4389193432 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaowei Ma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityComputer scienceWireless ad hoc networkDistributed computingVehicular ad hoc networkLeverage (statistics)Scheme (mathematics)Intelligent transportation systemComputer networkTrustworthinessArchitectureDistributed hash tableAccess controlComputer securityEngineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed deep learning (DDL) within vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) holds profound significance in developing smart applications, such as intelligent transport systems and autonomous driving, where multiple parties are coordinated to leverage the training capability and acquisitive intelligence.Blockchain (BC) is a distribution technology promising for trustworthy DDL, holding the divide-and-conquer concept with decentralized management and consensus algorithms to reduce the exposure of sensitive controllers and thus the risks of malicious system-wide attacks.Moreover, zero trust architecture (ZTA) concepts are promoted as innovative cybersecurity solution which can be integrated with BC to address the resource-limited and infrastructure-less issues to augment the strength of DDL in VANETs.In this dissertation, the BC and ZTA potential is explored to construct reliable VANETs for trustworthy data sharing and thus to support significant within-VANET DDL and relevant applications.Firstly, virtualized distributed ledger technology (vDLT) is developed as the multimedia BC platform, followed by vDLT-based VANETs built to solve the unsteady communica-First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest appreaciation to my supervisor, Prof.Richard Yu, who have been working with his wholehearted dedication to supervise my PhD study.His immense knowledge and cutting-edge insights have been encouraging me of elevating my academic research quality.He have also endearvored to find fundings to support my study and daily life to keep my work proceeding smoothly.Without his invaluable advice and continous supports, the achievements during my study would have been impossible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207