MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389195498 · doi:10.5194/cp-2023-42-ac3

Reply on RC1

2023· peer-review· en· W4389195498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meike D. W. Scherrenberg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNetherlands Earth System Science CentreNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean Commission
KeywordsDeglaciationGeologyIce sheetGlacial periodBedrockPost-glacial reboundPleistoceneOceanographyIce shelfGeomorphologyPhysical geographyPaleontologySea iceCryosphereGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. During the glacial cycles of the past 800 thousand years, Eurasia and North America were periodically covered by large ice sheets. While the Late Pleistocene glacial cycles typically lasted 80 – 120 thousand years, the termination phases only took 10 thousand years to complete. During these glacial terminations, the North American and Eurasian ice sheets retreated which created large proglacial lakes in front of the ice sheet margin. Proglacial lakes accelerate the deglaciation as they can facilitate ice shelves in the southern margins of the North American and the Eurasian ice sheets. Ice shelves are characterized by basal melting, low surface elevations and negligible friction at the base. Here we quantify the effect of proglacial lakes, and the combined effect with glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) on Late Pleistocene glacial terminations. We find that proglacial lakes accelerate the deglaciation of the ice sheets mainly because of the absence of basal friction underneath ice shelves. If the friction underneath grounded ice is applied to floating ice, we find that full deglaciation is postponed by a few millennia, the Barents-Kara Sea region does not fully deglaciate, and there are no extensive ice shelves. Additionally, the large uncertainty in melt rates underneath lacustrine ice shelves translates to an uncertainty in the timing of the termination of only a few centuries at most. Proglacial lakes are created by the depression in the landscape that linger after the ice sheet has retreated. The depth, size and timing of proglacial lakes depend on the bedrock rebound. We find that if the bedrock rebounds within a few centuries, instead of a few millennia, the mass loss rate of the ice sheet is substantially reduced. This is because fast bedrock rebound prevents the formation of extensive proglacial lakes. Additionally, a decrease in thickness is partly compensated by the faster bedrock rebound, resulting in a higher surface elevation with lower temperatures and higher surface mass balance delaying deglaciation. We find that a very long bedrock relaxation time does not affect terminations substantially, but will lead to a later inception of the next glacial period. This is because initial inception regions, such as North-Western Canada, remain below sea level throughout the preceding interglacial period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0250.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2030.156

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→